[{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BlogPosting","@id":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/appeals-court-refuses-prop-8-rehearing\/#BlogPosting","mainEntityOfPage":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/appeals-court-refuses-prop-8-rehearing\/","headline":"Appeals Court Refuses Prop 8 Rehearing","name":"Appeals Court Refuses Prop 8 Rehearing","description":"By Brittny Drye Not satisfied with the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals February ruling that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional, marriage equality opponents sought an...","datePublished":"2012-06-05","dateModified":"2021-07-08","author":{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/author\/admin\/#Person","name":"Equally Wed","url":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/author\/admin\/","identifier":787,"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ca62cf123aaaf135c80b055249bacbda79de9226e11cdfcde6529bedf89683de?s=96&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ca62cf123aaaf135c80b055249bacbda79de9226e11cdfcde6529bedf89683de?s=96&r=g","height":96,"width":96}},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Equally Wed","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"http:\/\/equallywed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/equally-wed-lgbtq-weddings-logo.jpg","url":"http:\/\/equallywed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/equally-wed-lgbtq-weddings-logo.jpg","width":218,"height":60}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","@id":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/proposition-8-ruled-unconstitutional.jpg","url":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/proposition-8-ruled-unconstitutional.jpg","height":200,"width":300},"url":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/appeals-court-refuses-prop-8-rehearing\/","about":["Marriage Equality News"],"wordCount":203,"articleBody":" By Brittny DryeNot satisfied with the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals February ruling that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional, marriage equality opponents sought an en banc review with a larger panel.On Tuesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it will not rehear  the case, ensuring that three-panel decision that Prop 8 is  unconstitutional stays \u2026 for the time being.\u201cProposition 8 served no purpose, and had no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California,\u201d the court said in its February ruling.Prop 8 supporters have vowed to take it to the next step, appealing it to the U.S. Supreme Court. They have 90 days to request an intervention from the higher power, and, in the meantime, a stay on same-sex marriages in California will remain until the issue is exhausted.The original ruling upheld the decision by retired Chief U.S. District  Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who struck down  the ballot measure in 2010 after  holding an unprecedented trial on the  nature of sexual orientation and  the history of marriage. His ruling  was overturned after he failed to  disclose that he was in a long term  same-sex relationship, prior to the  trial.\u00a0Photo: techbanyan.com"},{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org\/","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Appeals Court Refuses Prop 8 Rehearing","item":"https:\/\/equallywed.com\/appeals-court-refuses-prop-8-rehearing\/#breadcrumbitem"}]}]